Revised 7-1-08
1. When documenting non-compliance on the monitoring report, the licensing staff:
(1) documents what is observed rather than what is needed. For example, the licensing staff writes "milk was not served with lunch" instead of "milk must be served at lunch;"
(2) discusses areas of non-compliance with the operator and documents the discussion in writing on the monitoring report;
(3) provides a copy of the monitoring report to the operator and governing board or owner, as applicable; and
(4) if the person in charge refuses to sign the monitoring report, documents the refusal on the report.
2. Plan of correction.
(1) If the time period suggested by the operator for correction of non‑compliance is unacceptable to the licensing staff, the licensing staff states his or her expectation and negotiates an acceptable time period.
(2) The plan of correction may include an agreement by the administrator or director to specific conditions, such as agreeing to restrict a person convicted of child abuse from the premises or agreeing not to allow certain staff to transport children because of a prior conviction for driving under the influence (DUI). The agreement:
(A) is placed in a prominent location in the facility's file, such as stapled inside the front cover, so it is readily seen by anyone reviewing the case record; and
(B) includes the conditions that must be complied with, but does not include confidential information; for example, the caregiver has three DUI convictions or the person restricted from the premises has a child abuse conviction.
3. Licensing staff assesses both the number and type of non-compliance observed during monitoring visits or substantiated as a result of a complaint investigation. Response is based on the seriousness of the non‑compliance and the demonstrated ability and willingness of the provider to comply.
(1) The licensing staff response goes beyond documentation of the non‑compliance and a plan of correction on the monitoring report when a monitoring visit involves:
(A) five or more areas of non‑compliance;
(B) areas of non-compliance that have been repeated three or more times during a 12-month period; or
(C) non-compliance that is serious or places children in danger.
(2) The licensing staff advises the programs manager of the planned response and, if the supervisor disagrees, the case history is staffed and a different or additional response may be utilized.
4. A non-compliance letter is sent by licensing staff within ten working days, and includes the date of the monitoring visit and the area(s) of non-compliance. If a critical non-compliance remains uncorrected at the next monitoring visit, a letter documenting both visits and a follow-up visit are required.
5. The timing of a return visit is determined by the risk level to children. A return visit does not routinely result in a change in the monitoring frequency plan. If subsequent visits require a follow-up, increased monitoring is discussed with the programs manager.
6. Procedure and documentation for denial or revocation of license.
(1) The licensing staff ensures that the non-compliance and a plan of correction are clearly documented on the monitoring report, and the facility's action to implement any previous plans of correction. It is noted on the monitoring report that failure to correct the non-compliance may result in, denial of application, revocation of license, filing an injunction, or issuance of an Emergency Order, as applicable.
(2) The licensing staff conducts monitoring visits at least monthly to monitor compliance and the plan(s) of correction. The same witness accompanies the licensing staff on monitoring visits whenever possible.
7. Notification is documented by the licensing staff when the provider voluntarily ceases to operate until the investigation is completed or voluntarily closes the facility, or the district attorney issues an injunction.